STAUFFER v. BROOKS BROTHERS, INC. , No. 13-1180 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on December 17, 2013.
Download PDF
Case: 13-1180 Document: 70 Page: 1 Filed: 01/09/2014 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ RAYMOND E. STAUFFER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BROOKS BROTHERS, INC. AND RETAIL BRAND ALLIANCE, INC., Defendants-Appellees, AND UNITED STATES, Intervenor-Appellee. ______________________ 2013-1180 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 08-CV-10369, Judge Sidney H. Stein. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ ORDER Raymond E. Stauffer moves the court to accept his reply brief for filing. He separately moves for oral argument. Case: 13-1180 Document: 70 2 Page: 2 STAUFFER Filed: 01/09/2014 v. BROOKS BROTHERS, INC. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to accept the reply brief for filing is granted. (2) The motion for oral argument is deferred for consideration by the merits panel assigned to hear the case. (3) A copy of the papers relating to the motion for oral argument and this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to decide this case. FOR THE COURT /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk of Court s26
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
