RICHARD WILLIAMSON v. CITRIX ONLINE, LLC , No. 13-1130 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on November 5, 2014.

Download PDF

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ RICHARD A. WILLIAMSON, Trustee for At Home Bondholders Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CITRIX ONLINE, LLC, CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., MICROSOFT CORPORATION, ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants-Appellees WEBEX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CISCO WEBEX, LLC, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants-Appellees INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2013-1130 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 11-CV-2409, Judge A. Howard Matz. ______________________ ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC ______________________ 2 WILLIAMSON v. CITRIX ONLINE, LLC Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, dissents from the grant of the petition for rehearing en banc. PER CURIAM. ORDER A petition for rehearing en banc having been filed by Appellees, a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed by the Appellant, the petition and response having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal, the petition and response thereafter having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service, and a poll having been requested and taken, Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The petition for rehearing en banc is granted for the limited purpose of overruling certain prior precedent regarding the application of 35 U.S.C. § 112, para. 6. (2) The panel’s judgment and original opinion entered on November 5, 2014, and reported at 770 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2014), is vacated and is replaced by a new panel opinion issued this date. FOR THE COURT June 16, 2015 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.