DEEP9 CORP. v. BARNES & NOBLE , No. 13-1031 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DEEP9 CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BARNES & NOBLE, INC., AND BARNESANDNOBLE.COM, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. ______________________ 2013-1031 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in No. 11-CV-0035, Judge James L. Robart. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ CHRISTIAN E. MAMMEN, Hogan Lovells US, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel on the brief were ERIC B. FASTIFF and DAVID T. RUDOLPH, Lieff, Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, of San Francisco, California; and KIM D. STEPHENS and CHASE ALVORD, Tousley Brain Stephens, PLLC, of Seattle, Washington. JOHN B. QUINN, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for defendantsappellees. Of counsel on the brief were DAVID EISEMAN and JEFFREY S. GERCHICK, of Washington, DC; and MELISSA J. BAILY, of San Francisco, California. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, O MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 13, 2013 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.