ST. CLAIR INTELL. PROP. v. MATSUSHITA ELEC. INDUST. , No. 12-1652 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ST. CLAIR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONSULTANTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, JVC AMERICAS CORPORATION, VIVITAR CORPORATION, PETTERS GROUP WORLDWIDE, LLC, POLAROID CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, LLC, POLAROID HOLDING COMPANY, AND POLAROID CORP., Defendants, AND RESEARCH IN MOTION LTD. AND RESEARCH IN MOTION CORP., Defendants-Appellees. ______________________ 2012-1652, -1653, -1654 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 08-CV-0371, Judge Leonard P. Stark. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ LEIGH C. TAGGART, Rader, Fishman & Grauer, PLLC, of Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, argued for plaintiffappellant. On the brief was CHARLES W. BRADELY. DOMINIC E. MASSA, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were KEVIN S. PRUSSIA; and SETH P. WAXMAN, of Washington, DC; and CHRISTOPHER R. NOYES, of New York, New York. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 18, 2013 Date /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.