ST. CLAIR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONSULTANTS V. MATSUSHITA , No. 12-1652 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 12-1652 Document: 29 Page: 1 Filed: 10/10/2012 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. Wniteb ~tate~ QCourt of §ppeaI~ for tbe jfeberaI <!Circuit ST. CLAIR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CONSULTANTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, JVC AMERICAS CORPORATION, VIVITAR CORPORATION, PETTERS GROUP WORLDWIDE, LLC, POLAROID CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, LLC, POLAROID HOLDING COMPANY, AND POLAROID CORP., Defendants, AND RESEARCH IN MOTION LTD. AND RESEARCH IN MOTION CORP, Defendants-Appellees. 2012-1652, -1653, -1654 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case nos. 04-CV-1436, 06-CV0404, and 08-CV-0371, Judge Leonard P. Stark. Case: 12-1652 Document: 29 Page: 2 Filed: 10/10/2012 ST. CLAIR INTELLECTUAL PROP v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUST 2 ON MOTION ORDER The court treats the motion of St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. to dismiss Nokia Corporation, Nokia, Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Kyocera Wireless Corporation, Kyocera Communications, Inc., Palm, Inc., HTC Corporation, HTC (BVI) Corp. and HTC America, Inc. as defendants-appellees as a motion to reform the caption. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) The revised official caption is reflected above. FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s26

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.