APELDYN CORP. V. AU OPTRONICS CORP. , No. 12-1172 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. mtniteb ~tate~ (!Court of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit APELDYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees, AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC., Defendants-Appellees, AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants. 2012-1172 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L. Robinson. APELDYN CORP v. AU OPTRONICS 2 ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA's (collectively "CMO") motion for a one-month extension of time, until December 5, 2012, to file their response brief, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. CMO's response brief is due no later than December 5,2012. FOR THE COURT NOV 28 2012 Date cc: Scott G. Seidman, Esq. Terrence Duane Garnett, Esq. Donald R. McPhail, Esq. s25 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk U.s. COURf~~~EALS FOR THE FEDEP.~'. r.'tlCUIT NOV 28 Z012 JAN HORBALY CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.