APELDYN V. AU OPTRONICS , No. 12-1172 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
---~----- NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. Wntteb ~tate~ ([ourt of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI <!Ctrcutt S3 GRAPHICS co., LTD. AND S3 GRAPHICS, INC., Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, AND APPLE INC., Intervenor. 2012-1127 On appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-724. ON MOTION Before SCHALL, Circuit Judge. ORDER S3 Graphics Co., Ltd. and S3 Graphics, Inc. move for leave to add an appendix citation to their reply brief and add the document to the appendix. Apple Inc. opposes and moves to strike the portions of S3 Graphics Co., Ltd. S3 GRAPHICS CO v. ITC 2 and 83 Graphics, Inc.'s reply brief that reference the citation. 83 Graphics Co., Ltd. and 83 Graphics, Inc. respond. We grant the motion to the extent that 83 Graphics Co., Ltd. and 83 Graphics, Inc. may file a supplemental appendix that includes the document. The relevance of the documents is left to the merits panel. Accordingly, IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) 83 Graphics Co., Ltd. and 83 Graphics, Inc.'s motion is granted to the extent stated above. Apple Inc.'s motion is denied. (2) A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel, to explain the supplement. FOR THE COURT NOV 02 2012 Date cc: George A. Riley, Esq. Donald R. Dunner, Esq. Clark S. Cheney, Esq. s26 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly ·Clerk u.s.ntE FEDERAt CIRCUITFOR couJ~~Jl'EAL$ NOV 02 ZOlZ JANHORBAlY ClERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
