LECTROLARM CUSTOM SYSTEMS, INC. V. VICON INDUSTRIES, INC., No. 12-1156 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LECTROLARM CUSTOM SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VICON INDUSTRIES, INC. and UTC FIRE & SECURITY AMERICAS CORPORATION, INC., Defendants, and SENSORMATIC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, and BOSCH SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ 2012-1156 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee in Case No. 03-CV-2330, Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ GARY M HOFFMAN, Dickstein Shapiro LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were KENNETH W. BROTHERS, MEGAN S. WOODWORTH and GIANNI MINUTOLI. SEAN WILLIAM GALLAGHER, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee, Sensormatic Electronics Corporation. With him on the brief were STEVEN J. NACHTWEY and ASHA L.I. SPENCER. JONATHAN SAUL FRANKLIN, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee, Bosch Security Systems, Inc. With him on the brief were ERIK G. SWENSON, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and GEORGE W. JORDAN, III, of Houston, Texas. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PROST, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 21, 2012 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.