SEIKO EPSON V CORETRONIC CORP, No. 11-1120 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, and EPSON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. and EPSON AMERICA, INC., Counterclaim Defendants, v. CORETRONIC CORPORATION, Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee, and OPTOMA TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________ 2011-1120 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in Case No. 06-CV-6946, Judge Marilyn Hall Patel. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ EDWARD P. WALKER, Oliff & Berridge, PLC, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellant and counterclaim defendant appellees. With him on the brief were JAMES A. OLIFF, JOHN W. O MEARA and WILLIAM J. UTERMOHLEN. STEVEN D. HEMMINGER, Alston and Bird, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for defendant/counterclaimantappellee and defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were YITAI HU and ELIZABETH H. RADER. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and DYK, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 11, 2011 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.