QIMONDA AG V ITC, No. 10-1270 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ QIMONDA AG, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and LSI CORPORATION, Intervenor, and SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY (US) HOLDINGS INC., SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC, and SEAGATE (US) LLC, Intervenors. ____________________ 2010-1270 ______________________ Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-665. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ BRIAN R. MATSUI, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were G. BRIAN BUSEY, MARK E. UNGERMAN and MICHAEL W. MAAS; and ADAM KESER, of McLean, Virginia. SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were JAMES M. LYONS, General Counsel, and ANDREA C. CASSON, Assistant General Counsel. BRUCE S. SOSTEK, Thompson & Knight LLP, of Dallas, Texas, argued for all intervenors. With him on the brief for LSI Corporation were JANE P. BRANDT, HERBERT J. HAMMOND, MAX CICCARELLI, RICHARD L. WYNNE, JR. and Also on the brief for Seagate MICHAEL HEINLEN. Technology, et al.. were JOHN M. CARACAPPA and CHARLES F. SCHILL, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, of Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, GAJARSA and PROST, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 18, 2011 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.