THERASENSE V BECTON, No. 08-1511 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ THERASENSE, INC. (NOW KNOWN AS ABBOTT DIABETES CARE, INC.) AND ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, AND NOVA BIOMEDICAL CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees, AND BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, Defendant-Appellee. __________________________ 2008-1511, -1512, -1513, -1514, -1595 __________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in consolidated case nos. 04-CV-2123, 04-CV-3327, 04-CV-3732, and 05-CV-3117, Judge William H. Alsup. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 2 __________________________ TIVO INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ECHOSTAR CORPORATION, ECHOSTAR DBS CORPORATION, ECHOSTAR TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, ECHOSPHERE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ECHOSTAR SATELLITE LLC, AND DISH NETWORK CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellants. __________________________ 2009-1374 __________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no. 2:04-CV-01, Judge David Folsom. __________________________ ON MOTION __________________________ ORDER Oral arguments en banc for the above-noted appeals are scheduled for Tuesday, November 9, 2010, in courtroom 201. Appeal No. 2008-1511, Therasense, et al. v. Becton Dickinson and Company, et al., will be argued at 10 a.m. Appeal No. 2009-1374, Tivo, Inc. v. Echostar Corporation, et al., will be argued at 11 a.m. Counsel for each side for each appeal will be allowed 30 minutes to argue. Counsel for each party shall notify the clerk in 3 writing by August 16, 2010, of the name of the attorney who will argue for that party. FOR THE COURT June 3, 2010 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Rohit Kumar Singla Rachel Krevans Bradford J. Badke Seth P. Waxman E. Joshua Rosenkranz All Amicus Curiae Counsel 2008-1511, -1512, -1513,-1514,-1595 2009-1374

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.