TAKEDA PHARMA V TEVA PHARMA, No. 08-1314 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Corrected: November 10, 2008 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1314 TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, Plaintiff-Appellee, and TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., Defendants-Appellants. William F. Cavanaugh, Jr., Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler LLP, of New York, New York, argued for all plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief were Stuart E. Pollack, Chad J. Peterman, and Melissa Mandrgoc. Eric J. Lobenfeld, Hogan & Hartson LLP, of New York, New York, for plaintiffappellee Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. With him on the brief were Arlene L. Chow, Tedd W. Van Buskirk, Dillon Kim; and Philippe Y. Riesen, of Tokyo, Japan. Henry C. Dinger, Goodwin Procter LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defendants-appellants. On the brief were John L. North, Jeffrey J. Toney, Jeffrey D. Blake, Darcy L. Jones, and David A. Reed, Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Delaware Judge Sue L. Robinson NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1314 TAKEDA PHARMACEUTIAL COMPANY LIMITED, Plaintiff-Appellee, and TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., Defendants-Appellants. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in CASE NO(S). 06-CV-33 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, LINN, Circuit Judge, WARE*, District Judge). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED November 7, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk * Honorable James Ware, District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.