VENTURE INDUSTRIES V AUTOLIV ASP, No. 08-1113 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1113 VENTURE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, and VEMCO, INC., PATENT HOLDING COMPANY, and LARRY J. WINGET, Plaintiffs, v. AUTOLIV ASP, INC. (successor to Morton International, Inc.), Defendant-Appellee. John E. Anding, Drew Cooper & Anding, of Grand Rapids, Michigan, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Thomas V. Hubbard and Theodore J. Westbrook. Cyrus Amir-Mokri, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Peter E. Greene. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Senior Judge Avern Cohn NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1113 VENTURE INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, and VEMCO, INC., PATENT HOLDING COMPANY, and LARRY J. WINGET, Plaintiffs, v. AUTOLIV ASP, INC. (successor to Morton International, Inc.), Defendant-Appellee. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in CASE NO(S). 99-CV-75354 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (DYK, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED July 10, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.