SOLOMON V OOC, No. 07-6002 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-6002, -6003 ROBERT SOLOMON, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE, Respondent, and OFFICE OF THE ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL, Respondent. Jeffrey H. Leib, of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. William Wachter, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Office of Compliance, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent Office of Compliance. With him on the brief was Peter A. Eveleth, General Counsel. Kelsi Brown Corkran, Attorney, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent Office of the Architect of the Capitol. With her on the brief were Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, and Marleigh D. Dover, Attorney. Appealed from: Office of Compliance NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-6002, -6003 ROBERT SOLOMON, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE, Respondent, and OFFICE OF THE ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL, Respondent. Judgment ON APPEAL from the Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance In CASE NO(S). 02-AC-62 (RP) and 04-AC-13 (RP). This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and DYK, Circuit Judge. AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: _September 9, 2008____ / s / Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.