MCCULLOUGH V US, No. 07-5039 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-5039 GEORGE CALVIN MCCULLOUGH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. George Calvin McCullough, of Anderson, South Carolina, pro se. Richard P. Schroeder, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for defendantappellee. With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Kathryn A. Bleecker, Assistant Director. Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims Judge Emily C. Hewitt NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-5039 GEORGE CALVIN MCCULLOUGH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. __________________________ DECIDED: June 6, 2007 __________________________ Before MAYER, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and PROST, Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM. George Calvin McCullough appeals from the final judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing his complaint. McCullouch v. United States, No. 06-483 (Sept. 29, 2006). We dismiss Mr. McCullough s appeal. I An appeal from the Court of Federal Claims must be filed within 60 days after entry of judgment. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(b). Mr. McCullough did not file his notice of appeal until 88 days after the Court of Federal Claims entered its judgment dismissing his complaint. II The requirement of a timely filed notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional, and cannot be waived. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 61 (1982); see Fed. R. App. P. 26(b) (stating that the court may not extend the time to file a notice of appeal ). An untimely appeal to this court must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Sofarelli Associates, Inc. v. United States, 716 F.2d 1395, 1396-97 (Fed. Cir. 1983). Because Mr. McCullough s appeal is untimely, we dismiss. No costs. 2007-5039 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.