WHIRLPOOL V LG ELECTRONICS, No. 07-1370 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1370, -1402 WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION and WHIRLPOOL PATENTS COMPANY, Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, v. LG ELECTRONICS, INC. and LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., Defendants-Appellants, and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. Daniel A. Boehnen, McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiffs-cross appellants. With him on the brief were Christopher M. Cavan and Sean M. Sullivan. Kenneth R. Adamo, Jones Day, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for defendantappellant General Electric Company. With him on the brief were Lawrence D. Rosenberg, of Washington, DC, and Susan M. Gerber, of Cleveland, Ohio. Of counsel were Gerald R. Ross and Douglas R. Cole, of Atlanta, Georgia. Richard L. Stroup, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et al. With him on the brief were Don O. Burley, Gerson S. Panitch, Parmanand K. Sharma, and Andrew C. Sonu. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan Judge Robert Holmes Bell NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1370, -1402 WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION and WHIRLPOOL PATENTS COMPANY, Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, v. LG ELECTRONICS, INC. and LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., Defendants-Appellants, and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan In CASE NO(S). 1:04-CV-100. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, PLAGER, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: _October 10, 2008__ / s / Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.