NEUTRINO DEVELOPMENT V SONOSITE, No. 07-1325 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1325 NEUTRINO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counterclaim DefendantAppellee, and RICHARD T. REDANO, Counterclaim-Defendant Appellee, v. SONOSITE, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant Appellant. William C. Norvell, Jr., Beirne, Maynard & Parsons, L.L.P., of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellee and counterclaim-defendant appellee. With him on the brief were Scott D. Marrs and Brian T. Bagley. Paul E. Krieger, Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P., of Houston, Texas, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-appellant. With him on the brief were Lucas T. Elliot, William J. Boyce, and C. Erik Hawes. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern of Texas Judge John D. Rainey NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1325 NEUTRINO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counterclaim DefendantAppellee, and RICHARD T. REDANO, Counterclaim-Defendant Appellee, v. SONOSITE, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant Appellant. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in CASE NO(S). 01-2484 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (NEWMAN, FRIEDMAN, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED March 14, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly____________ Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.