MICROPROCESS ENHANCE V TEXAS INST, No. 07-1249 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on April 1, 2008.
Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT April 16, 2008 ERRATA Appeal No. 2007-1249, -1286 MICROPROCESS ENHANCE V TEXAS INST. Decided: April 1, 2008 Precedential Opinion Please make the following change: Page 18, lines 14-17: the text has been amended to read as follows: After the word Id. at line 14, strike: Phillips teaches that these sources should be accorded relative weights in the order listed, with the words of the claims themselves being the most relevant. Id. at 1314 19. Accordingly, we discuss each source of meaning of the claim term the pipeline stage in this order. And replace with: -Phillips teaches that these sources should be accorded relative weights depending on the circumstances of the case, with intrinsic sources being the most relevant. Id. at 1314 19. Accordingly, we discuss each source of meaning of the claim term the pipeline stage, granting each source the required relative weight. --
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
