IN RE BEIGEL, No. 07-1146 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1146 (Serial No. 10/064,380) IN RE MICHAEL L. BEIGEL, NATHANIEL POLISH, STEVEN R. FRANK, and ROBERT E. MALM Robert E. Malm, Robert E. Malm Law Offices, of Pacific Palisades, California, for appellant. Nathan K. Kelley, Associate Solicitor, Solicitor s Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, for appellee. With him on the briefs were Stephen Walsh, Acting Solicitor, and Thomas W. Krause, Associate Solicitor. Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1146 (Serial No. 10/064,380) IN RE MICHAEL L. BEIGEL, NATHANIEL POLISH, STEVEN R. FRANK, and ROBERT E. MALM JUDGMENT ON APPEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences In CASE NO(S). Serial No. 10/064,380 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36 Per Curiam (NEWMAN, RADER, and DYK, Circuit Judges). ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: October 18, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.