IN RE BURROWS, No. 07-1091 (Fed. Cir. 2007)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Corrected: August 9, 2007 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1091 (Serial No. 09/910,654) IN RE RODGER BURROWS Richard M. Saccocio, Richard M. Saccocio, P.A., of Plantation, Florida, argued for appellant. Nathan K. Kelley, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With him on the brief was William LaMarca, Associate Solicitor. Of counsel was Stephen Walsh, Acting Solicitor. Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1091 (Serial No. 09/910,654) IN RE RODGER BURROWS Judgment ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, SCHALL, Circuit Judges, FARNAN, JR., District Judge 1 ). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: August 9, 2007 1 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk Honorable Joseph J. Farnan, Jr., District Judge, United States District Court for the District of Delaware, sitting by designation.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
