AMPEX V EASTMAN KODAK, No. 07-1089 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1089 AMPEX CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, CHINON INDUSTRIES, INC., and ALTEK CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees. Jesse J. Jenner, Ropes & Gray LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffappellant. With him on the brief were Norman H. Beamer, of Palo Alto, California, and James E. Hopenfeld, of Washington, DC. Of counsel was Karen A. Christiansen, of Palo Alto, California. Michael J. Summersgill, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were William F. Lee, Donald R. Steinberg, Lauren B. Fletcher, and Jordan L. Hirsch, of Boston, Massachusetts, and S. Calvin Walden, of New York, New York. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Delaware Judge Kent A. Jordan NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1089 AMPEX CORPORATION Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, CHINON INDUSTRIES, INC., and ALTEK CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees. Judgment ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In CASE NO(S). 04-CV-1373. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam: (MAYER, DYK and MOORE, Circuit Judges): AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATE: February 7, 2008________ _/s/ Jan Horbaly___________________ Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.