CARITAS TECH V COMCAST, No. 07-1057 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1057 CARITAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMCAST CORPORATION, COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, COMCAST IP PHONE, LLC (doing business as Comcast Digital Voice), and COMCAST IP PHONE II, LLC, (doing business as Comcast Digital Voice), Defendants-Appellees. Kerry L. Timbers, Bromberg & Sunstein LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Lee Carl Bromberg, Karen A. Buchanan, and Meredith L. Ainbinder. Daralyn J. Durie, Keker & Van Nest LLP, of San Fransisco, California, argued for defendanst-appellees. With him on the brief were Asim M. Bhansali, and Matthias A. Kamber. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Judge David J. Folsom NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1057 CARITAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMCAST CORPORATION, COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, COMCAST IP PHONE, LLC (doing business as Corncast Digital Voice), and COMCAST IP PHONE II, LLC, (doing business as Corncast Digital Voice), Defendants-Appellees. JUDGMENT ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas In CASE NO(S). 2:05-CV-339 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (NEWMAN, RADER, and PROST, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: August 17, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.