IN RE BARNETT, No. 07-1047 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Corrected: October 30, 2007 2007-1047, -1075, -1076 (Serial Nos. 09/754,378, 09/321,597, and 09/543,735) IN RE CRAIG W. BARNETT, KAREN R. REISNER, and MARK BRAUNSTEIN Kevin T. Kramer, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were James G. Gatto, Scott J. Pivnick, and Robert M. Fuhrer, of McLean, Virginia. Thomas L. Stoll, Associate Solicitor, Solicitor s Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Stephen Walsh, Acting Solicitor, and Janet A. Gongola, Associate Solicitor. Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1047, -1075, -1076 (Serial Nos. 09/754,378, 09/321,597, and 09/543,735) IN RE CRAIG W. BARNETT, KAREN R. REISNER, and MARK BRAUNSTEIN Judgment ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES in CASE NO(S). This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (SCHALL, BRYSON, AND MOORE, Circuit Judges. AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: October 11, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.