JAIYEOLA V. AT&T INC., ET AL., No. 23-4027 (9th Cir. 2024)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED APR 4 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Dr. GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA, Ph.D., MBA, Plaintiff - Appellant, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 23-4027 D.C. No. 5:23-cv-05182-EJD MEMORANDUM* v. AT&T INC.; T-MOBILE US, INC.; VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.; APPLE INC., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward J. Davila, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 26, 2024** Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges. Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in his action alleging Lanham Act * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We review for an abuse of discretion. Am. Trucking Ass’ns, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, 559 F.3d 1046, 1052 (9th Cir. 2009). We affirm. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Jaiyeola’s motion for a preliminary injunction because Jaiyeola failed to establish the requirements for such relief. See id. (plaintiff seeking preliminary injunction must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits, he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, the balance of equities tips in his favor, and an injunction is in the public interest). We reject as without merit Jaiyeola’s contentions that the district court erred in denying Jaiyeola’s request for judicial notice and unduly delayed ruling on Jaiyeola’s motion for a preliminary injunction. AFFIRMED. 2 23-4027

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.