DAVE ERLANSON, SR. V. USEPA, No. 22-35894 (9th Cir. 2024)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED APR 30 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVE WAYNE ERLANSON, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 22-35894 D.C. No. 4:22-cv-00091-DCN v. MEMORANDUM* U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 22, 2024** Before: CALLAHAN, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges. Dave Wayne Erlanson, Sr., appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the United States Environmental Protection Agency. We review de novo, Prather v. AT&T, Inc., 847 F.3d 1097, 1102 (9th Cir. 2017), and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court properly dismissed Erlanson’s action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Erlanson failed to establish that the United States waived its sovereign immunity. See Jachetta v. United States, 653 F.3d 898, 908 (9th Cir. 2011) (explaining that 42 U.S.C. § 1983 does not waive sovereign immunity for United States agencies). AFFIRMED. 2 22-35894

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.