JEREMY PINSON V. BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE, No. 22-16668 (9th Cir. 2024)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED MAR 25 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON, Petitioner-Appellant, No. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 22-16668 D.C. No. 4:19-cv-00421-RM v. MEMORANDUM* BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 19, 2024** San Francisco, California Before: FRIEDLAND, SANCHEZ, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. Federal prisoner Jeremy Vaughn Pinson appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the denial of a § 2241 petition. Lane v. Swain, 910 F.3d 1293, 1295 (9th Cir. 2018). We affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). As the district court held, the record demonstrates that Pinson did not properly exhaust her administrative remedies before filing her § 2241 petition. See 28 C.F.R. § 542.15; Martinez v. Roberts, 804 F.2d 570, 571 (9th Cir. 1986). Pinson does not dispute that she failed to submit a BP-11 form and alleges no facts indicating that prison officials prevented her from submitting one. AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.