IN RE: PRAVEEN KHURANA, ET AL V. STATE OF IDAHO, No. 20-35054 (9th Cir. 2022)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED DEC 14 2022 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS In re: PRAVEEN KHURANA, No. 20-35054 Debtor, ______________________________ D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00117-RHW PRAVEEN KHURANA, MEMORANDUM* Appellant, v. STATE OF IDAHO, Child Support Services, Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Robert H. Whaley, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 8, 2022** Before: WALLACE, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. Praveen Khurana appeals pro se from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his adversary proceeding. We have * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We affirm. In his opening brief, Khurana failed to address how the district court or bankruptcy court erred and has therefore waived his challenge to the dismissal of his adversary proceeding. See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (explaining that “we will not consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief”); Greenwood v. FAA, 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (noting that “[w]e will not manufacture arguments for an appellant . . . .”). AFFIRMED. 2 20-35054

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.