JEREMIAH PETLIG V. C. HARRAWAY, No. 19-35672 (9th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 22 2020 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JEREMIAH JAMES PETLIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 19-35672 D.C. No. 2:18-cv-00721-MJP MEMORANDUM* C. HARRAWAY, Officer, Defendant-Appellee, and SCOTT CARTER-ELDRED; et al., Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding Submitted July 14, 2020** Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges. Washington state prisoner Jeremiah James Petlig appeals pro se from the * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging inadequate medical care while he was a pretrial detainee. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Gordon v. County of Orange, 888 F.3d 1118, 1122 (9th Cir. 2018), and we affirm. The district court properly granted summary judgment because Petlig failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Harraway’s response to Petlig’s request for immediate medical attention was objectively unreasonable. See Gordon, 888 F.3d at 1124-25 (setting forth objective deliberate indifference standard for Fourteenth Amendment inadequate medical care claims brought by pretrial detainees). AFFIRMED. 2 19-35672
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
