JOHN RYSKAMP V. CIR, No. 18-71324 (9th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 19 2019 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN HENRY RYSKAMP, Petitioner-Appellant, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 18-71324 Tax Ct. No. 20628-17 v. MEMORANDUM* COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court Submitted March 12, 2019** Before: LEAVY, BEA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. John Henry Ryskamp appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s order dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his petition regarding his tax liabilities for tax years 2003, 2005-2006, and 2008-2010. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We review de novo the Tax Court’s dismissal for lack of subject * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). matter jurisdiction. Gorospe v. Comm’r, 451 F.3d 966, 968 (9th Cir. 2006). We affirm. The Tax Court properly concluded that it lacked jurisdiction over Ryskamp’s petition because the Internal Revenue Service’s letter that formed the basis for Ryskamp’s petition was not a notice of deficiency or a notice of determination. See 26 U.S.C. § 6212 (notice of deficiency); 26 U.S.C. § 6330 (notice of determination); Gorospe, 451 F.3d at 968 (the Tax Court is a court of limited jurisdiction, and its subject matter is defined by Title 26 of the United States Code). Contrary to Ryskamp’s contentions, his substantive due process arguments do not confer jurisdiction on the Tax Court. We reject as without merit Ryskamp’s contention that the Tax Court judge was biased against him. All pending requests and motions are denied. AFFIRMED. 2 18-71324
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
