RAUL BORBA-CARDOSO V. WILLIAM BARR, No. 17-70742 (9th Cir. 2020)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 25 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RAUL BORGES BORBA-CARDOSO, Petitioner, No. 17-70742 Agency No. A030-861-138 v. MEMORANDUM* WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted June 5, 2020** Pasadena, California Before: CALLAHAN and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and BENCIVENGO,*** District Judge. Raul Borges Borba-Cardoso petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals order of removal. In a concurrently filed opinion, we hold * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Cathy Ann Bencivengo, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. that perjury under section 118(a) of the California Penal Code is an “offense relating to . . . perjury” and is thus an “aggravated felony.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(S). Borba was convicted under section 118(a), and we therefore lack jurisdiction over his petition for review. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C). PETITION DISMISSED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.