Arazola-Galea v. United States, No. 16-73574 (9th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseMathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016), which clarified application of the categorical analysis to the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), did not establish a new rule of constitutional law. Rather, Mathis clarifies application of the categorical analysis to the ACCA. In this case, the Ninth Circuit denied petitioner's application for authorization to file a second or successive motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 to vacate a sentence.
Court Description: 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Denying an application for authorization to file a second or successive motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate a sentence, the panel held that Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016), which clarified application of the categorical analysis to the Armed Career Criminal Act, did not establish a new rule of constitutional law.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.