ALEXANDER BAKER V. CLAIR MARLO, No. 16-56893 (9th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED OCT 5 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALEXANDER C. BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellee, No. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 16-56893 D.C. No. 2:16-cv-02313-RGK-JPR v. MEMORANDUM* CLAIR MARLO, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 26, 2017** Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Clair Marlo appeals from the district court’s judgment in a copyright action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. NewGen, LLC v. Safe Cig, LLC, 840 F.3d 606, 616 (9th Cir. 2016) (grant of motion to enter default judgment); Brandt v. Am. Bankers Ins. Co. of Fla., * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 653 F.3d 1108, 1110 (9th Cir. 2011) (denial of motion to set aside entry of default and denial of motion to set aside default judgment). We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s orders entered on August 8, 2016, September 23, 2016, and December 1, 2016. Appellee’s motion to take judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 10) is denied as unnecessary. AFFIRMED. 2 16-56893

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.