JAYMAR ADAMS V. US CUSTOMS AND BORDER, No. 16-15230 (9th Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED APR 24 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAYMAR STANTON ADAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 16-15230 D.C. No. 5:14-cv-04673-BLF v. MEMORANDUM* UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION; RUSSELL HOLSOPPLE, Respondents-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Beth Labson Freeman, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 11, 2017** Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Jaymar Stanton Adams appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment on his petition for writ of mandamus under 28 U.S.C. § 1361. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Guatay Christian * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Fellowship v. County of San Diego, 670 F.3d 957, 970 (9th Cir. 2011) (crossmotions for summary judgment); Kildare v. Saenz, 325 F.3d 1078, 1082 (9th Cir. 2003) (denial of mandamus). We affirm. The district court properly granted summary judgment on Adams’s petition for writ of mandamus because Adams failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether his claim was “clear and certain” and whether there was “no other adequate remedy” available. See Lowry v. Barnhart, 329 F.3d 1019, 1021 (9th Cir. 2003) (setting forth elements for mandamus relief). Adams’s request to transfer this matter to the District of South Dakota, set forth in his opening brief, is denied. AFFIRMED. 2 16-15230

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.