CARLOS SAMAYOA-DELA ROSA V. MATTHEW WHITAKER, No. 15-73041 (9th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 3 2018 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CARLOS GEOVANNI SAMAYOA-DELA ROSA, No. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 15-73041 Agency No. A095-755-173 Petitioner, MEMORANDUM* v. MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted November 27, 2018** Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. Carlos Geovanni Samayoa-Dela Rosa, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review. Samayoa-Dela Rosa does not challenge the agency’s dispositive conclusion that his asylum application was untimely and that he failed to establish any changed or extraordinary circumstances to excuse the untimely filing. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). Thus, his asylum claim fails. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on inconsistencies between Samayoa-Dela Rosa’s testimony and declaration as to the events of his first interaction with gang members, who caused SamayoaDela Rosa’s motorcycle accident, the identity of his grandfather’s murderer, and based on the omission of Samayoa-Dela Rosa’s cousin’s murder from his declaration. See Shrestha, 590 F.3d at 1048 (adverse credibility finding reasonable under the totality of the circumstances). In this case, in the absence of credible 2 15-73041 testimony, Samayoa-Dela Rosa’s withholding of removal claim fails. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003). Finally, Samayoa-Dela Rosa’s CAT claim fails because it is based on the same testimony the agency found not credible, and Samayoa-Dela Rosa does not point to any other evidence in the record that compels the conclusion that it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of Guatemala. See id. at 1156-57. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 3 15-73041
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
