AMR MOHSEN V., No. 15-60071 (9th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 15 2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: AMR MOHSEN, Debtor. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 15-60071 BAP No. 14-1435 -----------------------------MEMORANDUM* AMR MOHSEN, Appellant, v. CAROL WU, Appellee. Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Jury, Dunn, and Kirscher, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding Submitted August 9, 2017** Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Chapter 7 debtor Amr Mohsen appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) order dismissing Mohsen’s appeal for lack of prosecution. We review de novo our own jurisdiction. Silver Sage Partners, Ltd. v. City of Desert Hot Springs (In re City of Desert Hot Springs), 339 F.3d 782, 787 (9th Cir. 2003). We dismiss for lack of appellate jurisdiction. The bankruptcy court properly certified its March 25, 2014 order as final under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) (“Rule 54(b)”). See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7054(a) (applying Rule 54(b) to adversary proceedings); Ariz. State Carpenters Pension Tr. Fund v. Miller, 938 F.2d 1038, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 1991) (court of appeals must independently determine that the judgment is final). We lack jurisdiction because Mohsen did not file a timely notice of appeal after the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002(a)(1), (b)(1) (notice of appeal must be filed within 14 days after entry of the order being appealed; time to file an appeal runs from entry of the order disposing of a timely post-judgment tolling motion); 28 U.S.C. § 158(c)(2) (an appeal to the BAP must be taken within the time provided by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002); Anderson v. Mouradick (In re Mouradick), 13 F.3d 326, 327 (9th Cir. 1994) (“[T]he untimely filing of a notice of appeal deprives the appellate court of jurisdiction to review the bankruptcy court’s order.” (citations omitted)). Mohsen’s request for oral argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied. DISMISSED. 2 15-60071
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
