USA V. JOSE VERDIN-ALDAMA, No. 15-10028 (9th Cir. 2016)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 25 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 15-10028 15-10029 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:14-cr-50050-RM 4:14-cr-00197-RM v. JOSE GUADALUPE VERDINALDAMA, a.k.a. Guadalupe VerdinAldama, a.k.a. Jose Verdin-Aldama, a.k.a. Javier Verdin-Lopez, MEMORANDUM* Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Marquez, District Judge, Presiding Submitted January 20, 2016** Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. In these consolidated appeals, Jose Guadalupe Verdin-Aldama appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 18-month sentence for attempted reentry of a removed * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and 18-month sentence imposed thereupon. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Verdin-Aldama’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Verdin-Aldama the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Verdin-Aldama waived the right to appeal his conviction. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We, accordingly, dismiss the appeal of the conviction in case number 15-10029. See id. at 988. Because Verdin-Aldama has fully served both the sentence imposed in case number 15-10029 and the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release, we dismiss the appeal of the sentence in case number 15-10029 and the appeal in case number 15-10028 as moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 12-14 (1998); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED. 2 15-10028 & 15-10029
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
