CATHERINE PALPAL-LATOC V. LORETTA E. LYNCH, No. 14-72520 (9th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED AUG 01 2016 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CATHERINE QUINOLA PALPALLATOC, No. 14-72520 Agency No. A079-300-183 Petitioner, MEMORANDUM* v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted July 26, 2016** Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. Catherine Quinola Palpal-Latoc, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). applications for adjustment of status and a waiver under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(i). We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to consider Palpal-Latoc’s contention that her due process rights were violated by the IJ’s bias, because Palpal-Latoc did not raise this contention in her brief to the BIA. See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (the court lacks jurisdiction to consider legal claims not presented in an alien’s administrative proceedings before the agency). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 2 14-72520

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.