BAKARI MACKEY V. CONRAD GRABER, No. 14-15886 (9th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 10 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BAKARI DARNELL MACKEY, Petitioner - Appellant, No. 14-15886 D.C. No. 4:12-cv-00163-CKJ v. MEMORANDUM* CONRAD M. GRABER and US ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted April 12, 2016 San Francisco, California Before: WALLACE, SCHROEDER, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Bakari Mackey appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Mackey asserts that his due process rights were violated by failures of his inmate representative and the prison discipline hearing officer’s denial of his right to call witnesses on his behalf at a prison disciplinary hearing. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we review the district court judgment de novo. United States v. Lemoine, 546 F.3d 1042, 1046 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed on April 7, 2014, adopting the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation. AFFIRMED.1 1 Mackey’s pending pro se motion for judicial notice is denied as moot. 2 14-15886

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.