USA V. MARSHALL RICHMOND, No. 13-30341 (9th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED AUG 19 2014 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 13-30341 D.C. No. 3:03-cr-00370-KI v. MEMORANDUM* MARSHALL CHARLES RICHMOND, a.k.a. Marshall Charles Richmond, III, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Garr M. King, District Judge, Presiding Submitted August 13, 2014** Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Marshall Charles Richmond appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Richmond s counsel has filed a brief stating that * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Richmond has filed two pro se supplemental briefs. No answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. All other pending motions are denied as moot. AFFIRMED. 2 13-30341

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.