SABRINA LAGUNA V. COVERALL NORTH AMERICA, INC., No. 12-55479 (9th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on June 3, 2014.
Download PDF
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SABRINA LAGUNA, an individual; CARLOS ACEVEDO, an individual; TERESA SALAS, an individual; ROES 3–50, on behalf of themselves and in a representative capacity for all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, No. 12-55479 D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02131JM-BGS ORDER AMRIT SINGH, Objector-Appellant, v. COVERALL NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation; ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation; ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation; CNA HOLDING CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; TED ELLIOTT, an individual; DOES, 5–50, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Jeffrey T. Miller, Senior District Judge, Presiding 2 LAGUNA V. COVERALL NORTH AMERICA, INC. Filed November 20, 2014 Before: Ronald M. Gould and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges, and Edward M. Chen, District Judge.* COUNSEL Shannon Liss-Riordan (argued), Licthen & Liss-Riordan, P.C., Boston, Massachusetts; Monique Olivier, Duckworth Peters Lebowitz Olivier, LLP, San Francisco, California, for Objector-Appellant. Raul Cadena & Nicole R. Roysdon, Cadena Churchill, LLP, San Diego, California; L. Tracee Lorens & Wayne Alan Hughes, Lorens & Associates, APLC, San Diego California, for Plaintiffs-Appellees. Norman M. Leon (argued), DLA Piper LLP, Chicago, Illinois; Mazda K. Antia, Cooley LLP (argued), San Diego, California; Jeffrey A. Rosenfeld & Nancy Nguyen Sims, DLA Piper LLP, Los Angeles, California, for DefendantsAppellees. Theodore H. Frank, Center for Class Action Fairness, Washington, D.C.; Adam Ezra Schulman, Student Press Law Center, Arlington, Virginia, for Amicus Curiae Center for Class Action Fairness. * The Honorable Edward M. Chen, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. LAGUNA V. COVERALL NORTH AMERICA, INC. 3 ORDER The court has been advised that the parties have reached a settlement in this action. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED AS MOOT, and the previously filed opinion reported at 753 F.3d 918 (9th Cir. 2014) is VACATED. Each party shall bear its own costs.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
