RYAN BONNEAU V. J. THOMAS, No. 12-35861 (9th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 22 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RYAN BONNEAU, No. 12-35861 Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:11-cv-01347-BR v. MEMORANDUM* J. E. THOMAS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 13, 2014** Before: CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. Federal prisoner Ryan Bonneau appeals pro se from the district court s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition and its order denying his motion to set aside the judgment. We dismiss the appeal as moot. Bonneau contends that his due process rights were violated at a prison * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). disciplinary hearing in April 2011 that resulted in the loss of seven days of goodconduct time and the loss of telephone privileges. After filing his section 2241 petition, Bonneau completed the custodial portion of the sentence that he was serving at the time of the disciplinary hearing and was placed on supervised release. The record further reflects that, in December 2013, the district court revoked supervised release and imposed a new sentence. Because there is no injury than can be redressed with a favorable decision, the case is moot. See Burnett v. Lampert, 432 F.3d 996, 1000-01 (9th Cir. 2005). DISMISSED. 2 12-35861

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.