ANTONIO HINOJOS V. KOHL'S CORPORATION, No. 11-55793 (9th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on May 21, 2013.
Download PDF
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANTONIO S. HINOJOS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 11-55793 D.C. No. 2:10-cv-07590ODW-AGR v. KOHL S CORPORATION , a Wisconsin corporation; KOHL S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellees. ORDER Filed July 8, 2013 Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges. ORDER The majority opinion filed May 21, 2013, is hereby amended as follows: 1. Footnote 6, Slip. Op. at 11, is deleted. 2 HINOJOS V . KOHL S CORP . With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are denied. The petition for rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No future petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
