USA V. TODD JEREMY RICE, No. 11-30249 (9th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED FEB 23 2012 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 11-30249 D.C. No. 6:07-cr-00012-CCL v. MEMORANDUM * TODD JEREMY RICE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 21, 2012 ** Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. Todd Jeremy Rice appeals from the district court s judgment revoking his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1291, and we affirm. Rice contends that the district court abused its discretion when it determined * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). that he violated the terms of his supervised release. Specifically, Rice contends that there was insufficient evidence to show that he violated supervised release by (1) illegally possessing a controlled substance, and (2) failing to report for drug testing. The record reflects that the government proved the violations by a preponderance of the evidence. See United States v. Turner, 312 F.3d 1137, 1142 (9th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion when it revoked Rice s supervised release. See United States v. Daniel, 209 F.3d 1091, 1094 (9th Cir. 2000). AFFIRMED. 2 11-30249

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.