YOLANDA QUIHUIS V. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE I, No. 11-18067 (9th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on April 4, 2014.
Download PDF
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT YOLANDA E. QUIHUIS and ROBERT QUIHUIS, a married couple, Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 11-18067 D.C. No. 4:10-cv-00376-RCC v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant-Appellee. ORDER AMENDING ORDER CERTIFYING QUESTION TO THE ARIZONA SUPREME COURT Filed May 6, 2014 Before: Richard C. Tallman and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges, and Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge.* Order * The Honorable Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation. 2 QUIHUIS V. STATE FARM ORDER The certification order filed on April 4, 2014, is amended as follows: 1. At page 7, lines 15 17, delete <<while the Coxes were best served to admit ownership in order to obtain an agreement from the Bojorquezes not to execute a judgment against them>> and insert <<while the Coxes were best served to admit ownership in order to obtain an agreement from the Quihuises not to execute a judgment against them>>. 2. At page 8, lines 5 7, delete <<More specifically, the issue is whether the stipulation (and the subsequent default judgment) between the Coxes and the Bojorquezes that the Coxes owned the Jeep>> and insert <<More specifically, the issue is whether the stipulation (and the subsequent default judgment) between the Coxes and the Quihuises that the Coxes owned the Jeep>>.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
