USA V. PABLO MEDINA-RUIZ, No. 11-10545 (9th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 19 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 11-10545 11-10546 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:11-cr-50078-DGC 2:11-cr-50139-DGC v. PABLO ARMANDO MEDINA-RUIZ, MEMORANDUM * Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 13, 2012 ** Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. In these consolidated appeals, Pablo Armando Medina-Ruiz appeals from the revocation of his supervised release and the concurrent 24-month sentences imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Medina-Ruiz s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided MedinaRuiz the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. 2 11-10545 & 11-10546

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.