USA V. RAFAEL MOLINA-MARTINEZ, No. 11-10092 (9th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
FILED FEB 22 2012 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 11-10092 D.C. No. 4:10-cr-01809-FRZ v. MEMORANDUM * RAFAEL MOLINA-MARTINEZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Frank R. Zapata, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 21, 2012 ** Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. Rafael Molina-Martinez appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Appellant. P. 34(a)(2). Molina-Martinez contends that the district court erred when it applied a 16level enhancement, under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, because his prior conviction for lewd or lascivious acts with a child under 14 years of age, in violation of Cal. Penal Code § 288(a), does not qualify as a crime of violence. He contends that United States v. Baron-Medina, 187 F.3d 1144, 1147 (9th Cir. 1999), holding that a violation of Cal. Penal Code § 288(a) is categorically a crime of violence, is inconsistent with Johnson v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 1265 (2010). This contention lacks merit. See United States v. Orozco-Acosta, 607 F.3d 1156, 1166 (9th Cir. 2010) (citing United States v. Medina-Villa, 567 F.3d 507 (9th Cir. 2009)). Accordingly, we decline Molina-Martinez s invitation that we seek en banc review of this issue. AFFIRMED. 2 11-10092

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.