ELIZABETH HASKELL V. KAMALA D. HARRIS, No. 10-15152 (9th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on February 23, 2012.
Download PDF
FILED FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 25 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ELIZABETH AIDA HASKELL; REGINALD ENTO; JEFFREY PATRICK LYONS JR.; AAKASH DESAI, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, No. 10-15152 D.C. No. 3:09-cv-04779-CRB ORDER Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General of California; EVA STEINBERGER, Assistant Bureau Chief for DNA Programs, California Department of Justice, Defendants - Appellees. KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Page 2 Judges Nguyen, Watford and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote as to whether the case should be taken en banc.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
