Lorenzo Magana v. Eric Holder, Jr., No. 09-71232 (9th Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 26 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LORENZO MAGANA, a.k.a. Lorenzo Magana-Mendoza, No. 09-71232 Agency No. A072-232-210 Petitioner, MEMORANDUM * v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted October 19, 2010 ** Before: O SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges. Lorenzo Magana, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals ( BIA ) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review de novo questions of law, Cazarez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft, 382 F.3d 905, 909 (9th Cir. 2004), and we deny the petition for review. Magana s conviction for receipt of stolen property in violation of Cal. Penal Code § 496(a) is an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G). See Verdugo-Gonzalez v. Holder, 581 F.3d 1059, 1060-61 (9th Cir. 2009). We disagree with Magana s contention that his conviction records do not constitute admissible evidence. See Sinotes-Cruz, 468 F.3d 1190, 1196-97 (9th Cir. 2006) (holding that [t]he guiding principle is that proper authentication requires some sort of proof that the document is what it purports to be ). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 09-71232

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.