Mark Delaplane v. John Marshall, No. 09-56910 (9th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APR 13 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS MARK DELAPLANE, Petitioner - Appellee, No. 09-56910 D.C. No. 2:08-cv-02306-JFWMAN v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, MEMORANDUM* Respondent - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted December 8, 2010 Pasadena, California Before: PREGERSON, CLIFTON, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Warden John Marshall appeals from the district court s grant of the petition for habeas corpus of Mark Delaplane. In light of the Supreme Court s recent decision in Swarthout v. Cooke, 131 S.Ct. 859 (2011), we hold that Delaplane s federal right to due process was not violated. Delaplane was allowed an * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. opportunity to be heard and was provided a statement of the reasons why parole was denied. Id. at 862. Thus, Delaplane is not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus. Delaplane argues that Cooke did not address whether the Constitution requires a showing of some evidence of future danger before states can deny parole. This argument has been rejected by our precedent. See Pearson v. Muntz, --- F.3d ----, 2011 WL 1238007, at *5 (9th Cir. 2011). Delaplane also argues that the Governor violated his due process rights by not granting Delaplane a hearing before reversing his grant of parole. This argument was raised for the first time in a letter filed pursuant to Rule 28(j) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. It was thus made too late, and is not properly before us. See id. at *5 n.5. REVERSED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.