ROSALINA CUELLAR DE OSORIO V. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, No. 09-56786 (9th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on April 20, 2012.

Download PDF

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROSALINA CUELLAR DE OSORIO; ELIZABETH MAGPANTAY; EVELYN Y. SANTOS; MARIA ELOISA LIWAG; NORMA UY; RUTH UY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 09-56786 D.C. No. 5:08-cv-00840JVS-SH v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; JANET A. NAPOLITANO, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, Secretary of State, Defendants-Appellees. TERESITA COSTELO and LORENZO P. ONG, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 09-56846 D.C. No. 8:08-cv-00688JVS-SH v. JANET A. NAPOLITANO, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMGRATION ORDER 2 CUELLAR DE OSORIO V. MAYORKAS SERVICES; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; LYNNE SKEIRIK, Director of the National Visa Center; CHRISTINA POULOS, Acting Director, California Service Center, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, Secretary of State, Defendants-Appellees. On Remand From The United States Supreme Court Filed October 2, 2014 Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Harry Pregerson, M. Margaret McKeown, Kim McLane Wardlaw, William A. Fletcher, Raymond C. Fisher, Ronald M. Gould, Richard A. Paez, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Milan D. Smith, Jr., and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges. ORDER In accordance with the Supreme Court s opinion of June 9, 2014, in Scialabba v. Cuellar de Osorio, 134 S. Ct. 2191 (2014), as well as the resulting judgment, the judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California is AFFIRMED. This order serves as the mandate of the Court.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.